![wavelab elements 9 tutorial wavelab elements 9 tutorial](https://www.gearnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/steinberg-wavelab-box.jpg)
![wavelab elements 9 tutorial wavelab elements 9 tutorial](http://www.arsov.net/SoundBytes/Images/2018-07/WL-01_Main.jpg)
I am an amateur songwriter, and a lot of my peers master using that LANDR website. Some folks don’t “master at all” and for what they’re doing it’s fine. Especially with Cubase 11 pro’s monitoring (SuperVision) which has any kind of monitoring you might want. There is no reason you cant create a mastering template and work effectively inside cubase.
![wavelab elements 9 tutorial wavelab elements 9 tutorial](http://www.arsov.net/SoundBytes/Images/2017-01/WL-MR-EQ.jpg)
If you are mixing ONE song and releasing it, after mastering ONE song, and it’s not going to CD or vinyl, I don’t see why home users would benefit from Wavelab. Or doing a mastering session on an album of 10 songs. In my opinion, Wavelab made more sense in the era where you are mastering to CD.
#Wavelab elements 9 tutorial pro
I'm not quite sure if these are on Cubase Pro by default)Ĭonclusion: Unless you're a mastering engineer or own a record label, Wavelab is not a must-have piece of software for creating music. (Edit: I forgot mentioning Wavelab has regular mastering units like dithering, which typically comes with most of mixing/mastering bundles. Giving you the option to import almost any audio formats (e.g. ) into files in both track level and album level. Wavelab allows you to embed all the industry-standard informations (e.g. Embedding music metadata and tags, is an essential part of mastering. It comes really handy if you're mastering an entire album. Offering a wide variety of codecs and file formats in order to export/batch process audio files. In my experience the main features that separate Wavelab as a mastering tool, are: I'm using Cubase Pro for production/mixing and Wavelab Elements for mastering.